Did you forget to mention in this piece your longrunning weird feud with the subject of the story?http://flintwaterstudy.org/2017/06/tyt-threatens-flintwaterstudy-public-battle/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @johnson90909 @ArthurDelaneyHP
And like I already said, the last census...which is what gives you the population size, Flint has 102,000 people. Hence at least 50 samples needed to be taken to satisfy the lead and copper rule.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @johnson90909
The most recent round of testing, by MSU, had more than 90 samples. The sampling methods have their faults — as the scientists admit — but Flint’s water has been more rigorously rested than water in any other city. All that allows the government to say is it’s “as safe”
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArthurDelaneyHP @johnson90909
You mean the sampling that relies on the same faulty methods as the others, i.e. not being certain they are actually testing homes connected to lead service lines and relying on old records written on index cards?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Stenography of what publicly-funded officials tell you isn’t journalism Arthur. If you knock on doors like I just did, you will learn some truly scandalous things about the way water was tested (having nothing to do with Edwards). But, u won’t do that as you simply believe..
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.