Did you forget to mention in this piece your longrunning weird feud with the subject of the story?http://flintwaterstudy.org/2017/06/tyt-threatens-flintwaterstudy-public-battle/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
FYI: In regards to the population issue,
@JordanChariton was referencing the Lead&Copper Rule. Per the article: ‘The LCR states that for a system with over 100,000 people, a reduced monitoring sampling would have to collect at least 50 samples’.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
For the FINAL TIME—The EPA’s lead and copper regulation goes by the U.S. census for population size. A quick Google search for the 2010 census (most recent census) haw Flint at 102,000. Your argument is not based on fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And having reported in Flint now 10 times...and based off what I uncovered this week—I can PROMISE YOU the testing has major red flags. But you’ll probably miss my report on that since ur head is a little too far up someone’s anus!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.