After months of investigating, here is my piece on #FlintWaterCrisis that I believe clearly shows declarations made of "restored" & "normal" water in Flint are based on VERY flawed science...from an EPA-funded scientist & state of Michigan #FlintLeadAstrayhttps://www.truthdig.com/articles/fraudulence-in-flint-how-flawed-science-has-declared-the-crisis-over/ …
-
-
The most recent round of testing, by MSU, had more than 90 samples. The sampling methods have their faults — as the scientists admit — but Flint’s water has been more rigorously rested than water in any other city. All that allows the government to say is it’s “as safe”
-
You mean the sampling that relies on the same faulty methods as the others, i.e. not being certain they are actually testing homes connected to lead service lines and relying on old records written on index cards?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And REGARDLESS of population size, the EPA must give WRITTEN PERMISSION in order to conduct reduced monitoring. So not only was reduced monitoring used wrongly but also without needed permission. You’re either dumb or deliberately not getting it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.