After months of investigating, here is my piece on #FlintWaterCrisis that I believe clearly shows declarations made of "restored" & "normal" water in Flint are based on VERY flawed science...from an EPA-funded scientist & state of Michigan #FlintLeadAstrayhttps://www.truthdig.com/articles/fraudulence-in-flint-how-flawed-science-has-declared-the-crisis-over/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @JordanChariton
Did you forget to mention in this piece your longrunning weird feud with the subject of the story?http://flintwaterstudy.org/2017/06/tyt-threatens-flintwaterstudy-public-battle/ …
8 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArthurDelaneyHP
Pretty interesting that as a journalist your response to an investigative piece that shows serious flaws in the science that's been used to declare Flint safe is to comment on a "feud" rather than look into whether your own reporting has been wrong
2 replies 13 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton
felt like your piece is highlighting well-known flaws with the LCR to create a misleading impression of what scientists actually say about Flint's water
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
If u actually read the piece, you'll see LCR requirements were not met. Even if they were, if u find it suitable to declare a system's water supply as normal based off 34 homes (in a city of 40,000 homes), you should probably get a new profession bc u lack the proper scrutiny.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.