At the risk of having a row with a structure as it's being demolished, we've given this debate plenty of coverage. I'll dig out some links when I've more time.
-
-
You have... but once the council spin doctors got going you ceased reporting the local debate and significant grounds for objection. This latest report contains a blatant untruth.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Jonperrybarr @PFlyover en
Hello Jon, if you've issued a statement on this and it's not been used, please send it to me and I will add it to yesterday's coverage. We will be returning to this issue and more than happy to speak to people with a range of views.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Jim5875 @Jonperrybarr en
Do you actually mean a range of views, or do you actually mean Facebook rants exclusively from drivers as if they’re views are the only ones that count? Local residents have a range of views, you certainly won’t get those from Jon.https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/drivers-bid-farewell-a34-perry-19785201 …
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Brummiecris @Jim5875 en
Then there were the users of the X51 and other express buses, which made very clever use of the flyover. And the pedestrians who crossed safely under the A34 rather than across it. There will be many more of them in the future. Not exclusively drivers.
3 antwoorden 1 retweet 4 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Jonperrybarr @Brummiecris en
Also how many times a day will the people from the new housing press a button to cross. More congestion. Once again the flyover took non Perry Barr traffic over and away.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @PFlyover @Jonperrybarr en
That’s really not how pedestrian crossings work at busy intersections. Pedestrian crossing lights are integrated in to the traffic flow lights, the amount of times the button is pressed has zero relation to how often the lights change, they will be changing anyway for traffic.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Brummiecris @PFlyover en
Also this constant car first attitude is why the city is such a polluted mess.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Brummiecris @Jonperrybarr en
With no disrespect i am anti you but you have not been blocked so i can give you a chance. You are however suffering from tunnel vision and thats coming from a flyover. Are there any electric planes.... no...so cars are progressing quicker.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @PFlyover @Jonperrybarr en
You keep totally missing the point, it isn’t just about what files a vehicle, it’s the space that vehicle takes up. There’s no room for more cars electric or otherwise, we need less private cars not more. If you can’t engage with the actual argument, don’t bother replying.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
Actually you need to make your case. Too easy to mix up air pollution, climate change and congestion issues. They overlap but too often the arguments are confused and so are the public.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.