-
-
Of course the hierarchy of scientific evidence is found in academia. Anyone who's worked as a scientist knows this. https://libguides.mssm.edu/ebm/hierarchy https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(14)60041-0/fulltext …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
in fairness, washing test tubes is also important. to a smooth running department.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I work in academia (and have for longer than your 10 yrs). My lab has done studies with mice, fish, dogs, horses, cattle, & humans. Mice are great, but they are not the gold standard. And the hierarchy presented by Dr Switzer is well known among academics. The end.
-
Well said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
10 years at the university pub maybe? It’s on Grattan St.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ten years tending the gardens?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your words can place children in danger if their parents do not question the validity of your claim. You owe them facts, not speculation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better off Dead quote.."I've been going to this high school for 7 years! I'm no dummy!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your assertion seems at odds with the evidence (ironically!)... ...PubMed has 272 papers that explicitly mention it, it's regularly (& increasingly) searched for in Google, & just try typing "hierarchy of " in Google Scholar!
pic.twitter.com/m3eMFCmXJt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.