Show this thread
-
If anything, SF shows that if people do not have the pragmatic reality-based mindset that generated the wealth, then if given the wealth, they will vote for non-reality-based policies that flush it down the toilet.
Show this thread
I used to like SF — lived there a long time — but the problem is, I remember when it was way better than it is today, so it is very hard to like now. And personally, my life tactic has been to observe that “change from within” people almost always fail, and act accordingly.
-
-
The way to show that your thing is better is just to let the lame-ass people be lame-ass and go do the better thing, uncompromisingly. The lame-asses’ thing will fall apart and yours, if it is good, won’t. Then you don’t need to have 10000 useless arguments.
Show this thread -
In fact this is what is already happening. San Francisco is the worst part of the entire Bay Area now. If “tech” were a drain, Mountain View would look like Hamsterdam, but it’s the opposite.
Show this thread -
All that said, I agree with the article’s stance that SF’s decline bodes poorly for the future of the USA. For that reason, and for image purposes (probably many Americans think SF is the home of “tech”) it would be a good idea to fix it. That just seems impossible.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.