Jonathan Blow

That knowledge is what enables the company to build a context within which everyone’s work has the value that it does. Outside that context, the value of effort becomes tremendously less because it is not coordinated.

This is why the labor theory of value is wrong, because it is context and coordination that creates most of the value, not the actual labor per se.

And without the labour, it never happens. It is the labour that creates and sustains the company - and owning capital is what allows you to purchase that labour. Otherwise you're just another "ideas guy", one out of millions.

Well no. The labor is part of what creates and sustains the company, but if you took away all the knowledge and constant coordination and just had workers and said “okay workers, create and sustain the company”, well, it doesn’t work. The company is gone.

If all it took was labor to create and sustain a company, you would see a lot more successful companies, it would be much easier than it actually is. Any group of workers who got together would form a successful company. They would have no problem getting capital because

the lender would feel secure in loaning it, because all it takes is labor and they have the labor. That sounds like a very safe investment!!!

And still, nothing can exist without labour. Not a shred. All of it requires people working, and a lot, to make it happen.

Sure. I am just saying that the value of labor is contextual, and making successful contexts is very hard usually.