What is the contradiction? I didn't notice it!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
Replying to @Jonathan_Blow @bmc_
And then ask, how does this thing contaminate the ship if they had to work hard to even get it to survive in 3.5% nitrogen?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jonathan_Blow
The book made mention that the cabin was a reduced-pressure environment. It's possible the Hail Mary cabin was pure oxygen:https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/5690/why-is-the-breathing-atmosphere-of-the-iss-a-standard-atmosphere-at-1-atm-conta …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmc_
I mean, as the author you would kind of want to mention that pertinent fact though? (Maybe I missed it, but if so it was a minor aside, which is not good either). I guess it did come up in the "bead exchange" thing early on, I don't remember what that part said.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jonathan_Blow @bmc_
I guess I vaguely remember it being 1 oxygen and 26 ammonias, as opposed to multiple elements on each side, so, maybe that was the deal. Still seems like way too big a thing to elide like that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jonathan_Blow
The bead exchange is pretty good evidence! The atmosphere was at least majority-oxygen then. The reduced-pressure paragraph had some more detail, it's possible someone with sufficient knowledge of chemistry would come away from it knowing the atmosphere was pure oxygen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmc_ @Jonathan_Blow
I found an epub and the book never seems to outright say the ship is pure-oxygen but it strongly implies it:pic.twitter.com/b9ROOptI1u
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bmc_ @Jonathan_Blow
Actually, it seems to out-right say it here:pic.twitter.com/NhWq6rmPL2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, then, I just think it is a writing mistake to kind of bury that fact this far.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.