How many web developers understand that a low-end integrated GPU on a laptop can draw full 4k screens of pixels at 3000 frames per second?
-
3840 x 2160 x 4 bytes per pixel x 3000 fps = 92.7 GB/s. That's 3x the peak bandwidth (which I don't think you can reach) of an Intel Iris Plus 650, which I'm not sure is particularly low end, and also assumes you aren't doing RMW (and that you're purely BW bound).
I just picked the texel fill rate of an Intel Graphics 530 as a very round number to divide by.
-
-
I do think it’s ironic that the announcement promises to run the browser on a 16-core vCPU Xeon despite the fact that browsers still peak at 1-2 cores per tab (and you only need 1 active tab). You’d probably be much better off using a 2-core HT 4.8 GHz system.
-
Part of the issue is that browsers have a hard time knowing which tabs can be un-prioritized. Scripts in non active tabs keep running. Eg. If you have a conference call or video going in a “non-active” tab you wouldn’t want that to terminate. Now imagine no of tabs people use.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shouldn't you have picked the "pixel fill rate" which is 2.85GPixels/s rather than the "texel fill rate" which is almost 22.80GTexels/s?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.