Is there the equivalent of nand2tetris, but for distributed systems?
-
-
Replying to @LauraDeming
Don't know such, but this is an interesting paper https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/hotos15/hotos15-paper-mcsherry.pdf … (TLDR many usecases for distributed systems are more cost-effective on better optimised single machines)
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
-
Replying to @LauraDeming @ArtirKel
Most of the time when people think they have “Big Data” it is something you could run on your laptop actually. Computers are very fast.
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
MattyG Retweeted MattyG
MattyG added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do not think this means what you think it means.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think Jon's point has always been a) Yes, there is a tradeoff between convenience and performance b) People are making the wrong decisions because they systematically underestimate the cost of convenience. (i.e. the maintenance costs of distributed systems vs single) c) These
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
d) They also overestimate the convenience they are actually getting, and are not interested in measuring it and in fact don't really have any idea how to measure it, so no cost/benefit analysis can actually be performed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.