Jonathan Blow

It looks like you have a bug in the for_expansion for Bucket_Array. The it_index always goes from 0 to n-1, even for the reverse mode. Would have expected the index to be reversed too (which the bit array iterator does!)

1) both swift and rust have this (but in those languages it works by referring to an optional label that you put on the loop rather than a variable that you declare at the top of the loop, as in Jai) (i'm not sure it matters whether you do it the swift/rust vs the jai way...?)

2) "Maybe in time for C++29?" No. Please stop. C++ isn't going to get substantially better compared to the time/effort required to improve it. C++ just needs to be frozen, and people need to accept this sunk cost.

Yeah I meant it as a joke :)

Hello Jon I think it is better also to use backtick (') with defer inside the micros. 'defer = defer in the parent defer = local defer Bcz now it is very Confusion

Another thing, Also we can use better syntax for vars exports/imports inside the micros by replace backtik. to improve the read ability For example. -> value "this mean this micro will is useing value from its parent" <- value "... Wil Update this value. <-> value " for both"

my_micro :: (a: int) #expand { \\ on top for better read ability -> foo; <- bar; <-> hao; \\ now our micro code \\ valid \\ invalid foo := 2 foo = 2 bar := 5 + foo bar = hao - foo hao = 15 // local defer defer blabla(); // parent <- defer goodbye(); }