Hacker News upset that Google is going to turn off ad blocking: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20044430 … Few mention complexity of the web; nobody points out that if it weren’t so insanely complicated, it wouldn’t require a huge industrial effort to build a browser, so there would be no problem.
-
-
That must have been a lot of months ago. It's been a stable and performant desktop browser for me ever since they shipped Quantum.
-
For you.
-
Same can be said about your experience with Firefox. And I'd argue, Your experience is in the tiny minority.
-
I am not making it up ... hundreds of people saw the livestream. All I did was install Firefox on a new laptop and visit some web pages. P.S. One reason why open source doesn’t succeed at user-facing stuff is this non-product “your problem is not really a problem” mentality.
-
I will certainly agree that it *should not* be as complicated as it is to draw stuff on the screen, but given the current playing field, problems are being had.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Strange hearing all these problems people are having. I've been using Firefox exclusively for a couple of years, both on Linux and Windows, and have had no major problems. It's pretty snappy and feels nicer than Chrome did. Do you have any special use case which might explain it?
-
People like to take isolated incidents and then they spread them as the default state, and that will stop most people from trying for it themselves. Not really healthy for an already Google-dominated browser market.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No scroll lag here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Yup, Firefox is good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Firefox runs smoothly for me (using uBlock Origin and NoScript addons) and as it's run by a nonprofit foundation it's the only browser I recommend.
-
Biggest Mozilla donor: Google.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if you could finally finish the compiler, you could work on a new browser!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like browser are hit or miss some of the time. I use chrome at work because firefox randomly leaks memory on certain sites, but firefox at home because chrome takes ages to fullscreen and is laggier overall. Seems pretty random.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think any perceived technological gap between chrome and firefox is large enough to work as some kind of generalized argument for privatized software vs socialized.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As I recall the vsync calculation for Firefox has been horrible for a number of years, and they never bothered to change it. It's especially bad for > 60Hz displays
-
Ooh! Is the info on http://vsynctester.com (which I just encountered when trying to learn my monitor’s refresh rate, about 60Hz as it happens) a good explanation of the problem you are referring to?
-
Yeah, that looks like a good test. Chrome is not perfect (and there's a big notification at the top of the site saying it has issues), but Firefox is a joke by comparison, if that graph correlates to frame time it's like they're just flipping between 2 incorrect Hz values.pic.twitter.com/ljq2wGIRSX
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Firefox might not be the fastest browser in the world, but extensions like Tree Style Tabs has been an amazing productivity booster for me for 10 years. I don't use Chrome professionally because it lacks such a feature.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.