Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

Shapiro Chair of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, criminal defense attorney, and legal analyst. Blog:

Washington, D.C.
jonathanturley.org
Registrerte seg desember 2009
3 397 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @JonathanTurley

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@JonathanTurley.

  1. for 8 timer siden

    A federal judge just denied the motion for a preliminary injunction on the DOJ challenge to the Texas abortion law. The DOJ may have created unnecessary federalism and other issues with the filing.

    200 svar 178 retweets 503 liker
    Angre
  2. for 11 timer siden

    The alleged hiding of the connection to the Clinton campaign is notable because Sussman's co-partner Marc Elias was also accused of hiding the connection as part of the Clinton campaign's denials before the election.

    17 svar 158 retweets 435 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  3. for 12 timer siden

    One researcher states "The only thing that drive[s] us at this point is that we just do not like [Trump]. This will not fly in eyes of public scrutiny. Folks, I am afraid we have tunnel vision."

    13 svar 165 retweets 556 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  4. for 12 timer siden

    ...Here is the indictment. Notably it refers to his work with a "Tech Executive" who was promised a job in the Clinton administration. It also quotes recognition of the lack of factual support.

    17 svar 167 retweets 417 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  5. for 12 timer siden

    The indictment of Sussman is detailed and damning. It alleges that he hid the fact that he was working for the Clinton campaign in pushing the false Russian claim. ..

    182 svar 1 065 retweets 2 142 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  6. for 19 timer siden

    ...Milley's concerns—even if held in good faith—would not justify what is claimed by Woodward and Costa. If Milley told subordinates they were to await his concurrence on an attack order, he would have elevated his authority over the express authority delegated to a president.

    49 svar 291 retweets 1 039 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  7. for 19 timer siden

    While some pundits praised Milley for allegedly taking control over nuclear weapons and war declarations, the allegations, if true, could subject Milley to a possible court martial for usurping the authority of the commander in chief under Article II...

    105 svar 730 retweets 2 105 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  8. for 20 timer siden

    Underlying this dispute is an interesting question of the court’s role on the ballot question and, while she is wrong in her attack on the court, Omar may have a legitimate objection if the ballot question is blocked despite revisions.

    7 svar 9 retweets 37 liker
    Angre
  9. for 20 timer siden

    His late son Paul was accused of negligence and drunk driving in the boating death of a young woman, a case that many said was riddled with undue influence by the powerful family. What is interesting is the charge profile on both men in the warrants.

    3 svar 18 retweets 55 liker
    Angre
  10. for 22 timer siden

    ...Elias just started a firm that will work on legal ethics and campaign contributions. Sussman is still at Perkins Coie, the firm that played a critical role in the Steele dossier scandal.

    11 svar 52 retweets 177 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  11. for 22 timer siden

    I have previously written about the role of Perkins Coie partners Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann in the Russian dossier scandal. Now Sussman is being referenced in connection to Durham's grand jury....

    35 svar 179 retweets 483 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  12. 15. sep.

    This type of categorical refusal to comply with the school rule is unlikely to be supported in court. The video may be banned by social media, which will not allow such opposing views. However, I prefer such points to be made in a forum rather than a class.

    7 svar 16 retweets 132 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  13. 15. sep.

    Notably, unlike other professors who object due to their have natural immunities from prior cases of the virus, Clements is rejecting the vaccine due to what he views as objective countervailing data. He is also not claiming a religious exemption...

    25 svar 65 retweets 217 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  14. 14. sep.

    As will come as little surprise to many, I believe this is protected speech. The question for me is whether the university would tolerate a statement denying such inherent racism from a professor. That is the true test of free speech and academic freedom.

    22 svar 30 retweets 113 liker
    Angre
  15. 13. sep.

    His intended point is that this is what some have called "super precedent." Even if one rejects that status, there is a good faith argument that the Texas law is unconstitutional. I expect that lower courts will strike down the law without an enumeration.

    12 svar 20 retweets 87 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  16. 13. sep.

    ...From abortions to elections to rents, Biden is seeking to federalize huge areas to displace state law. Not since John Adams and his Federalist Party has the country faced such a fundamental challenge to our system of federalism.

    53 svar 242 retweets 654 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  17. 13. sep.

    President Joe Biden has long pledged to “build back better” but in the last few months it has become clear that his transformative plans go beyond mere infrastructure and extend to our very structure of government...

    60 svar 335 retweets 884 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  18. 13. sep.

    I think what was meant is that abortion has been a "recognized" constitutional right for "half of century." Indeed, even privacy is not "enumerated" or expressly stated in the Constitution. That does not mean that it is not a constitutionally protected right; just not enumerated.

    41 svar 40 retweets 276 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  19. 13. sep.

    Joe Scarborough: Abortion is a “specifically enumerated constitutional right” Inigo Montoya: "I do not think it means what you think it means.”

    65 svar 211 retweets 1 011 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  20. 13. sep.

    ...The documents compose our covenant of faith not with the government or the past but with each other. Before we bring in the dance groups and post the trigger warnings, perhaps what we need is a reaffirmation rather than a reimagination of who we are.

    16 svar 81 retweets 320 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre

@JonathanTurley har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·