On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
No kids or penis here but I find circumcision, without a religious reason, to be an odd thing to do. Why would we make a permanent decision like this for someone else?
4 replies . 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @tmlens
I am not going to get into that debate. I had said when the 'intactivists' invaded my thread on WOMEN and sexual dysfunction that I am JEWISH and got attacked for that in an amazing display of anti-semitism. Regardless the whole movement is based in
#AntiScience bull10 replies . 0 retweets 2 likes
What are the scientific pros for mgm then? It doesn't increase sexual ability, it's not cleaner unless you never wash your dick ever, in cases where the for skin is to tight other, less invasive treatments exist. Mgm has so medical basis.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.