Yes....... But technically, no? Can you define poverty in absolute (not relative) terms?
-
-
-
You don't have to for this to be the case, I don't think.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Pithy
but needs a caveat:
Some people who are NOT envious care about inequality BECAUSE of the ENVIOUS whose envy disrupts societal cohesion.
The obsessive focus on INequality in/of itself has ALWAYS struck me as FAR less productive than identifying concrete problems to fix. -
Gonna caveat again to forestall the predictable point-missers: Should go w/out saying that a just world must ensure that wealth is accrued justly. NO to abusive practice in all its permutations. The gap-gazing focus on the $ AMT[should serve mostly as a signal]is misplaced
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The pure truth captured in a sentence.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
But a compassionate person might care about inequality as a means to poverty, no?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.