I am a district nurse - there are carers will working - they are key workers.
-
-
Als antwoord op @CJJones16829986 @JonWorcesterMan
Apparently his wife is at risk, so they're shielding. We already paid for the chamber to be altered, flat screen TVs and £10k per MP for them to work at home. He just wants Johnson's baying mob back, by running the Coronavirus conga. Just a laughing stock!
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Deborah12474068 @JonWorcesterMan
They aren’t shielding - *she* is.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @CJJones16829986 @JonWorcesterMan
We are all still being told if we can work from home, we should. If we don't need to travel, don't. Try to keep infection rates down or we will have a second wave. The tech is already there, it's been working, at home he can't catch or pass the virus on. Not special, his voters r
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Deborah12474068 @JonWorcesterMan
I don’t disagree with your points about where working from home you should etc... Im saying if he can’t work from home (I don’t make the rules) then that is a choice. He isn’t shielding. Being a carer is hard, but not exceptional.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @CJJones16829986 @JonWorcesterMan
But he can work from home whilst taking care of his wife who is shielding, that's all. Why put them both at risk by his travelling to and from HoC? They do not need to be there to vote, why risk her but more seriously him travelling to and from possibly shedding? Save the NHS???
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Deborah12474068 @JonWorcesterMan
I don’t decide how people vote. He has a choice to make, he is not shielding, he himself is not vulnerable. It’s no different than anyone else being asked to return to work who isn’t shielding - just because someone is an MP doesnt mean they should have preferential treatment.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @CJJones16829986 @JonWorcesterMan
It's not about him, it's about the people he represents. It is different from other jobs, if he isn't there or has his voting rights curtailed, regardless of reason, his constituents are not represented. That's all, they are entitled to representation!
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Deborah12474068 @JonWorcesterMan
He can choose to go, he doesn’t have to remain at home - he will have two homes. It will be significantly easier for him than someone in minimal wage working as a key worker with no where to self isolate. It’s shit all round.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @CJJones16829986 @JonWorcesterMan
OK, I give up. I've tried to explain it's not about him.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
Then we are in agreement.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.