I gave up on mturk a while ago after the pay rate went up but maybe a few other meta-science people might be able to answer @Research_Tim @lakens @jamesheathers @siminevazire
Does anyone know of any data (or preprints or pubs) on the #replication rates of research conducted via MTurk versus, say, undergraduate samples? Please RT for more answers! #openscience
-
-
-
-
I think
@thosjleeper may be able to answer. -
Thanks
@Thosjleeper. The Mullinix et al paper is exactly what I was looking for- was wondering about false + rate, but national and convenience samples were similar here. Fascinating. I'd like to see the same thing with crowdsourced studies all from mturk, prereg vs not. -
was the concern whether Mturk samples somehow might produce more false positives? My concern w mturk in the past was more about false negatives rate due to inattentiveness and random clicking (i haven't thought about it for a while) but now people have ways to check for that.
-
Yes. I’m mainly wondering about false positive rates of mTurk studies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Latest awesome paper from
@IAcornflake et al says 'Master Mturk workers perform significantly better than the for-credit students'https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006337 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.