Tired of silly debate about “Capitalism Vs Socialism”. It isn’t an “either/or” situation. Markets work best for most industries/services, but not all. Debate should be about the role of the State in regulating markets for the greater good, & the services that should remain public
-
-
Als antwoord op @cpeedell
Free market vs socialism more apt. Group identity makes poorer choices than individual competition of ideas. Why should the state be the default regulator? For many consumer and digital products this isnt the case
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @cpeedell
Welcome to Galt's Gulch...https://www.salon.com/2015/03/02/my_libertarian_vacation_nightmare_how_ayn_rand_ron_paul_their_groupies_were_all_debunked/ …
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @jonburkeUK @cpeedell
Don't confuse anarchy and corruption for rejecting the intrusion of the state beyond its most natural of competencies. Every Honduras has a Venezuela we can sling around. It adds little to debate
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @cpeedell
Yes, but Libertarians have no Sweden to 'sling around'. Markets are an excellent servant, but a terrible master. State regulation - to ensure capitalism serves people, rather than people serving capitalism - works.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @jonburkeUK @cpeedell
Singapore, Korea, Switzerland...
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @jonburkeUK
None of those is a libertarian country. Singapore is a City State for starters
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
?? No nation is a pure anything if it's a democracy
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.