I find myself confused by the outrage here. I'm not being disingenuous – I honestly want to understand the thinking: https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2017/aug/29/usborne-apologises-puberty-book-childrens-publisher …
-
-
Als antwoord op @TomChivers
The Usborne book said that breasts have two functions: one, to feed children, and two, to "make the girl look grown-up and attractive".
10 antwoorden 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @TomChivers
It's telling young girls that having breasts makes you attractive, which is putting a lot of pressure on when some don't develop til later..
1 antwoord 0 retweets 9 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @KateEMcCann @TomChivers
... and reinforces the idea that breasts are there to be admired by someone who will find you attractive (or not). More pressure.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 11 vind-ik-leuks
Als antwoord op @KateEMcCann @TomChivers
Breasts are very attractive. Statement of the obvious. How many female presenters are unattractive? Of course it's important. Confected rage
03:12 - 30 aug. 2017
0 antwoorden
0 retweets
0 vind-ik-leuks
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.