Nigel Edwards of Nuffield Trust tells BMA conf: NHS has never experienced this level of austerity for this long a period
-
-
Als antwoord op @BBCHughPym
@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper NHS England budget: £107 billion = Austerity. Good grief.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley@HPIAndyCowper Nigel Edwards was referring to 0.85pc ave annual real increase in NHS funding in England1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @BBCHughPym
@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper Still, it's a tagline. £107 billion for NHS England is not austerity; in line with other EU health services now1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper ?? no it isn't - state healthcare spending for France, similar size, is something like £175bn1 antwoord 1 retweet 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @markgdayan
@markgdayan@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper No it isn't, it's state spend is not much higher than England's; private component boosts the total1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper no, that is STATE spending only. Multiply up world bank figures yourself if don't believe me!1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @markgdayan
@markgdayan@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper Have reviewed this. Spending is not the reason the French system delivers better, far from it.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley@BBCHughPym@HPIAndyCowper fair enough, that's a matter for debate, but not really in question that they do spend far more2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
@markgdayan @BBCHughPym @HPIAndyCowper Which given so much care is spent on end of life partially explains poor measured clinical outcomes.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.