Some solid proposals from GMC today. They are overdue but need to be properly explained and justified: http://www.gmc-uk.org/mobile/news/25358.asp …
-
-
@bendean1979@threestain Of course there is because when the case concludes so does the IO. What then for patient protection?1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern@bendean1979@threestain if case is concluded why need for further sanctions? How much blood do you want?1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @NickFerran
@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain I want sanctions for serious poor practise not watered down solely due 2 passage of time, so should you3 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern but is role of@gmcuk punishment or remediation or both?@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain2 antwoorden 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @amcunningham
@amcunningham@ShaunLintern@gmcuk@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain Judge and jury at the moment. Any FTPP should be chaired by a judge2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley courts seem to be in part driving tougher GMC stance@ShaunLintern@gmcuk@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @amcunningham
@amcunningham@ShaunLintern@gmcuk@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain Tough stance fine, even greater needs for high standards ie judge1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley commitment to 'public interest' comes from courts@ShaunLintern@NickFerran@bendean1979@threestain2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
@amcunningham @ShaunLintern @NickFerran @bendean1979 GMC should be plaintiff notjudge, our fees should cover prosectution and defence costs
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.