Won't be cheering about the Chinese premier's Better Together support - he says that to help China keep Tibet.
-
-
Als antwoord op @wallaceme
@wallaceme I've never understood the Free Tibet campaign, why not have a Free China campaign instead, then allow for self determination?2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley ...Germany instead of French liberation.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @wallaceme
@wallaceme France was a democracy pre-1940; Tibet not even close, even now. UN recognises Tibet as within China, UN saw France as occupied2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley second, are you really arguing countries only deserve freedom if they were previously free?1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @wallaceme
@wallaceme Why pick one part of China as a winner and not the whole country? Free Tibet is apropos to not recognising China's borders1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley I support a free china and a free Tibet. I also recognise that they are two different countries.2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @wallaceme
@wallaceme Can a free Tibet leave a free China? Of course, and can do so democratically. Any other way will lead to armed conflict1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
@JonMarcStanley it must be allowed to - but China will not allow that.1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
@wallaceme Nothing more artificial and unnatural in this world as democracy; it needs to be actively promoted at the national level
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.