We offered that. I can tell you, next time these parties will not get the kid gloves. They were offered a chance for a majority. They don't want one. They do not want to govern. Do-nothing opposition is easier for them. I HOPE they do win seats, but they're not trying to.
-
-
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @Erudite4Unity
You’re saying the three main parties refused to work with you (when you offered literally nothing of value to them) and your answer to that is to punish the ProGB voting public by adding a fourth party to the list? You don’t see how that makes you the bad guys do you.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792 @JonMarcStanley
Oh right. Were the 3 main pro-UK parties just about to announce widespread tactical constituency voting before A4U came along and spoiled everything? Rascals.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @Erudite4Unity @JonMarcStanley
Given that they still haven’t I’m not sure why you’re making out you’ve won some sort of victory. What exactly have you achieved? You won’t take seats from the Greens or SNP & you haven’t convinced labour and Lib Dem to stand down constituency candidates.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792 @JonMarcStanley
For months, we were the sole champions of tactical constituency voting and a list only model. Douglas Ross copied our tactical voting idea and Alex Salmond copied out list model. Why won't we take seats from the Greens? Their seats in Lothian and West Scotland are very winnable.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Erudite4Unity @JonMarcStanley
Because their seats, while winnable, are more likely to be won by Lib Dem, who I’m sure you know, didn’t field candidates in those regions in 2016 but in 2011 they got over 5% of the vote
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792 @JonMarcStanley
Oh really? Unfortunately, your tweet shows the danger of relying on information you find on the first page on Wikipedia. Can I suggest you dig a little deeper into the list votes per party in those regions in 2016 and come back to me with a properly researched answer next time?
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
We have to face a grim truth: Labour, the Lib Dems and the Conservatives are not in it to win it. Possibly it's fatalism, perhaps it suits opposition MSPs to pull in £64,074 a year and have no real responsibility. It's a pathetic state of affairs and they deserve a massacre.
6 antwoorden 19 retweets 43 vind-ik-leuks -
Perhaps, but if their is a massacre it’s the little people that will suffer for the next 5 years. 5 years, it’s a long time.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
A basically principle when dealing with a mucky wound. 1. Clean it out. 2. Cut out non-viable tissue that cannot grow to heal and can only turn to gangrene. 3. Wound ends up looking bigger at first but it's in a much better condition to heal, not fester on.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
A bigger wound heals faster and more fully than a dirty wound that can only get worse and send a patient septic.
-
-
Thank you. I'll be knitting this intel into my microbiology course.
0 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leukBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.