The list is where the Greens win seats, as you've shown. Alba will also win list seats in May. That's why a list only pro-UK party is essential. Unfortunately, too many people who don't understand the voting system insist this will hamper anti-nationalist parties.
-
-
Als antwoord op @Erudite4Unity
That’s nonsense, the list is where pro UK parties win and they already do win Your party will not add unionist seats it will take them away I’ve had one of your spokesmen tell me blatantly false information about how the vote works so you’re right, more education need to be done
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792
The pro-UK parties win all their seats in the list? That would explain why all 3 parties are fielding their own candidates in all 73 constituency seats then? Are you confident Con/Lab/LD can exceed the 2016 total of over 1 million wasted Unionist constituency votes this year?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Erudite4Unity
Why are your spokesmen saying that parties in the list vote lose votes if they run candidates in the constituency vote, even if they don’t win. This is either ignorant of the process or trying to mislead people.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792
Let's go back to this now. The pro-UK parties "win all their seats in the list" but all 3 parties are fielding their own candidates in all 73 constituency seats. Are you confident Con/Lab/LD can exceed the 2016 total of over 1 million wasted Unionist constituency votes this year?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Erudite4Unity
Votes wasted is irrelevant, seats won matters There is not one region where A4U is the best placed party, over Lib Dem, labour or Tory, to gain seats. Not one To say otherwise is ignorant of the process or lying Scotland needed tactical voting in the constituencies AND the list
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JohnStuart1792 @Erudite4Unity
We offered that. I can tell you, next time these parties will not get the kid gloves. They were offered a chance for a majority. They don't want one. They do not want to govern. Do-nothing opposition is easier for them. I HOPE they do win seats, but they're not trying to.
1 antwoord 5 retweets 7 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @Erudite4Unity
You’re saying the three main parties refused to work with you (when you offered literally nothing of value to them) and your answer to that is to punish the ProGB voting public by adding a fourth party to the list? You don’t see how that makes you the bad guys do you.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
The most disgraceful thing about A4U is they are running almost purely on a platform of tactical voting, but voting for them will almost certainly reduce the Unionist seat count.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
It’s a pity George Galloway didn’t join Scottish Labour. Ideally he could have become influential or on my wish list actual party leader. Imagine that, George Galloway leading (helping) labour to tactical voting with Douglas Ross. How things might have been.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
Neither you nor I believe that George RE-joining Labour would have made them any more open to persuasion.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.