That's the list strategy of entitled establishment parties down the cludgie.
Now @ScotTories @ScottishLabour @scotlibdems
About that @Alliance4Unity plan, where you pack in your stupid games, blue on blue briefings, and just stand ONE of you per constitiuency?
Getting it?
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @ScotTories en
A4U is not standing in the constituencies where tactical voting would work. They are standing in regional lists which are pretty much proportional adjusted for constituencies won. They could REDUCE number of unionists in Holyrood.pic.twitter.com/0lEIsNUCCb
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @dmck52 @ScotTories en
So on that basis why are current parties contesting unwinnable seats?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @ScotTories en
Because the party system is ingrained. Because a deep red Labour voter would struggle to vote Tory as true blue would have to hold their nose to vote Labour. If 'their' party stood down they might just not vote at all, so not even give a list vote.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @dmck52 @ScotTories en
So a unionist party is needed post May 6th. Pan-unionist party that will work either with Lab or Tories and never with Nats.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @ScotTories en
Maybe a single unionist party was needed after Nats just ignored 2014 result. Maybe we should have cooperated for past few years.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks
Yup but they want cost list seats in exchange for doing nothing. It's a gig. Ross isn't even contesting a seat.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.