I was pro lockdown back in April 2020. But then I woke up and saw a nightmare unfold while I was awake.
-
-
Or at least we thought it was required at the time. But there’s now several dozen peer reviewed studies refuting the effectiveness of lockdowns.
-
You cannot know the unknown. Just we never did it seriously because we never shut the airports. 22m came in through Heathrow last year. Madness if you are to lock down.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
We knew elderly were vulnerable at very early stage. Why didn’t we focus attention on them at that point? We could have held broader restrictions in reserve,if needed.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
It wasn't. It's an abhorrent policy and should never be used "just in case"
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
First house arrest was required to see how easy it would be to control people through fear. It was effortless
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
It wasn't required, but it could be excused for the first three weeks as no one seemed to know what they were doing.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
Meer antwoorden weergeven, waaronder antwoorden die mogelijk aanstootgevende content bevatten
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.