As a statutory body they do NOT create health policy. It is not their remit, which defined solely by the Medical Act. Docs who perform EPP have those vaccines to protect THEM. It is not remotely acceptable to medicate a doctor for political expediency. Stop playing games
-
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Nuremberg Code?
-
Not even that. UK law is very clear, explicitly clear, on compulsion of vaccination as a public health measure. It's an absolute no no. If they want the Medical Act reviewed, they're going the right way about it by testing limits.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Also it's not a vaccine. It's gene therapy
https://www.westonaprice.org/podcast/its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine/ … -
No it isn't for a simple reason. It uses RNA, not DNA. It is not inserted into the genome, hence not gene therapy in the conventional sense. The RNA once transcribed to protein is rapidly degraded. Hence the vaccine needs careful storage.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
It is to protect patients. Obviously (but not clear to nutcases!) is that doctors & nurses &/or carers are vaccinated so they won't catch C-19 & because symptoms come later than the initial infection, during which time they could infect patients, to protect the patients. Fixed it
-
But the vaccines don't stop transmission
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
It's about money, simple

Am I right in thinking, correct me if I wrong, that GPs are paid for every jab they get through their surgeries? -
I hope so!
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.