In which case, there will be some kind of proof. As it is, apparently all we have is the usual attempt to whip up hate against today's chosen target.
-
-
And proof requires an investigation. Glad you agree.
2 antwoorden 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
An investigation would require something more than throwing sh*t in the hope that some sticks. As you don't appear to have anything else, no, I don't agree.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Oh we have plenty. Enjoy the ride.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
"We need an inquiry to discover proof" "We have plenty (of proof). Enjoy the ride" Which is it Raheem?
1 antwoord 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Yes you’re right there couldn’t POSSIBLY be more that government is hiding from the public! Tut. Silly me. Glad we got those WMDs from Saddam eh!
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Either you have proof or you don't. Which is it, Raheem?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Can you read? I said P L E N T Y.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
You made two mutually contradictory statements. "We need an inquiry to find proof" and "We have plenty" Show your proof.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
There are multiple types of admissible proof. Geez, why am I always having to explain basic concepts to dumb asses on Twitter?
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
Because you are a bad person...... :D
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.