You don't use metal in advanced research reactors. Alloys yes, pure metal no. It swells a LOT under irradiation You use it to cast into hemispheres, slugs or Oralloy tampers. Metallic uranium is for for bombs. They're very close if they are doing this.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/17/grave-military-implications-iran-making-uranium-metal-alarms-europe …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Only one uranium bomb was used in anger. It was so simple it never needed testing. Hiroshima was the test.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leukDeze collectie tonen -
DPRK has subs. Iran has tankers. DPRK and Iran could definitely exchange materials.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
This echoes the trade in nuclear and other materials between Germany and Japan during WW2. Ironically the Japanese nuclear project was based in Manchukuo, in what is now N Korea.https://www.amazon.co.uk/Japans-Secret-War-Provided-Groundwork/dp/168261896X/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=wilcox+japans+secret&qid=1610993825&s=books&sr=1-1 …
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @No431onthelist
And WW1 with German merchant subs.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley
Wilcox makes a reasonable case that the N Korean bomb, was built on the foundations of the Japanese WW2 project. For which materials from Germany were important. Again a part of WW2 that is overlooked.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @No431onthelist
Nah, they used public available designs for a reactor from the UK. That started in the 80s. They've had scientists from Russia ( paid ) since the 90s. Well chronicled. The basic bomb designs have been around for 80 years.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Sure but theres no much data since then, easily acquired by DPRK.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.