Gay men as a group live a high risk lifestyle with monogamy seldom part of it. If exclusion offends you you are the problem. When was the last time the gov put out ads calling for donors? This hardly expands the pool but expands the risk. @B_HQhttps://twitter.com/MattHancock/status/1338409257486741505?s=07&fbclid=IwAR0CK0pcXtb5fql6zlnbZTHg0n0zSJYD1Ce11bvDE_rBbTjOxyvgxeJSCBE …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @B_HQ
What an embarrassing comment. Generalising any ‘group’ and arbitrarily labelling them as higher or lower risk is just ridiculous. All blood is thoroughly tested before use. And no groups should be excluded. A few sensible questions will help with the screening process. Silly man.
3 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @Hector89552594 @B_HQ
and yet clinically sound. What is it tested for Hector? Tell me the tests, their sensitivity, specificity and time windows? Indulge me in this magical world where risk is not stratified.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @B_HQ
If someone is on recurring medication for whatever reason, that medication should be considered during consultation. After the haemophiliac horror in the 1980’s, I understand that all blood is screened before use, but that shouldn’t be specific to any single group.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
We are not talking about screening. Screening will not pick up early infection where antibody tests are negative and infectivity high. This window by the way is the sole reason given by proponents of PrEP. So it can't be had both ways.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.