Gay men as a group live a high risk lifestyle with monogamy seldom part of it. If exclusion offends you you are the problem. When was the last time the gov put out ads calling for donors? This hardly expands the pool but expands the risk. @B_HQhttps://twitter.com/MattHancock/status/1338409257486741505?s=07&fbclid=IwAR0CK0pcXtb5fql6zlnbZTHg0n0zSJYD1Ce11bvDE_rBbTjOxyvgxeJSCBE …
-
-
People with high risk lifestyles take a different approach to risk to the rest of us. The very fact this has been lobbied for, without any patient demand is positive proof of that. The government has made no effort to increase blood donation in recent years. So why this?
Deze collectie tonen -
Is there an argument for having high risk donors as "extended criteria" donors in extremis, with informed consent? Yes But that isn't want lobbyists want. They want enforced acceptance of high risk lifestyles as normal. They're not. Don't judge but don't impose either
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.