Sorry, dry casks are NOT a permanent solution, especially not for un-reprocessed waste. Unless you have a plan to replace them every hundred-ish years for 100,000+ yearshttps://twitter.com/KersevanRoberto/status/1245462593898250244 …
Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
I dont know why the usa doesn't invest even uranium-only recovery (UREX). Reducing the bulk must be worth it?
Jimmy Carter made the decision during his admin to ban reprocessing due to fears of weapons proliferation. There isn’t any reason to believe that weapons grade material has been stolen from such facilities in their histories but Cold Wars fears were potent.
There are pros and cons of course to reprocessing especially without immediate Pu recycle but every time the nuclear industry has reduced or given up a capacity it feels like a one way ratchet. Civil reprocessing just isn't a serious proliferation threat, for so many reasons.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.