(Sorry to break my own rule re. not tweeting about #coronavirus but I’m confused)
Quarantining people is disruptive and costly. Testing people is possibly more costly, but less disruptive.
Wouldn’t it then make sense to test *everyone* in key roles - every MP for example?
To what end? In a dynamic environment you are chasing your tail. Better to exclude them and defer votes and debates. The Lords however, given their age, is a death trap.
-
-
You mean exclude the ones known to be infected? Or quarantine the whole lot of them, now, because of Dorries?
-
Latter. The papers coming out on the benefits of early mass quarantine show the evidence is overwhelming. You go in hard, very fast, take a hit, slow spread so that acute care capacity is not totally overwhlemed.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.