Mr Hancock does not say. And there is a reason for this. This mysterious 'red tape' does not actually exist. Mr Hancock is bullshitting: a thing on which he has formhttps://www.hsj.co.uk/governance/cowpers-cut-on-matt-hancock-bullshitting-and-lying/7024679.article …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
There is, moreover, an evident contradiction in his argument that NHS safety standards will be maintained while staff can retrain to another clinical discipline faster.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 7 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
This is an odd argument to make about an NHS that has had historically low funding increases 2010-20. If it had been possible to retrain staff faster without compromising safety standards, it would surely have been done.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 7 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
Andy Cowper heeft geretweet Mark Dayan
I'm grateful to
@NuffieldTrust's splendid Brexit expert@markgdayan for this clarification https://twitter.com/markgdayan/status/1228271966915891201 …, that the 'red tape' refers to the Professional Qualifications DirectiveAndy Cowper heeft toegevoegd,
Mark Dayan @markgdayanAls antwoord op @HPIAndyCowperHe's talking about the Professional Qualifications Directive https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32005L0036 … which does say medical training must take a certain amount of time. Whether this is one of the major Brexit issues, however, I'd dispute.1 antwoord 2 retweets 3 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
The Government does seem to believe that they can (re-)train people faster than the standards set down in the EU directive https://gov.uk/government/news/government-considers-more-flexible-training-for-healthcare-professionals-switching-discipline ……
3 antwoorden 1 retweet 3 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
Given Mr Hancock's promise of no lowering of standards, I'd be interested if anyone in the clinical training world thinks this very feasible, or knows of any relevant evidence.
4 antwoorden 1 retweet 7 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
No direct experience but it’s already happening in Scotland. Presumably without any new regulations?? https://www.ed.ac.uk/medicine-vet-medicine/edinburgh-medical-school/mbchb-for-healthcare-professionals …
1 antwoord 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Thank you Helen, I thought I'd heard of such schemes. Given that we are still under the EU directives and laws until 31 December 2020, this implies that Mr Hancock's argument is (as I thought) brown.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @HPIAndyCowper @helencrimlisk en
It seems to propose an alternative to the pre-clinical years. Given PBL courses out there (im old fashioned on this) as long as it satisfies the Medical Act and inline with Bologna Process I cant see huge issues with it. Even outside the EU Bologna applies.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @helencrimlisk en
Yes. What's incomprehensible to me is Mr Hancock's claim that current clinical training standards will be maintained in future shorter training times. It seems unlikely.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
Depends on degree structure. The trad split of 3PC and 2C should be able to handle this new course. Im only concerned at the attrition rate during those final two years. Which needs pilot audit. Still it's interesting BUT main issue is cap on undergrad med school places
-
-
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @helencrimlisk en
Let's imagine we're a university offering this training. Our fees are per annum, and capped. What is our incentive to offer more compressed courses? (And completely agree on cap on places.)
0 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leukBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.