The activist lawyers who brought this case chose to not fight it in London because they knew they would lose under English law. They had to retreat to Scotland which has a very different interpretation of constitutional matters.https://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1171727008574922753 …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
This has naff all to do with devolution.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 45 vind-ik-leuks -
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
It has FECK ALL to do with Devolutionpic.twitter.com/oGecCGY3aC
1 antwoord 12 retweets 40 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @Sheilam19534814 @blondiesa en
You can’t fix stupid. When people are oblivious to the facts- it’s no use arguing. You can point out the truth but my country’s trump supporters- these brexiteers are a couple of cans short of a six pack.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @lisafittko @Sheilam19534814 en
I'm a Brexiteer and well aware of the differences within our wonderful UK x
1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @Sheilam19534814 en
You’re an anomaly. John Snow didn’t even understand it yesterday while discussing it with a Scottish QC MP.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
He knows nothing, John Snow. Not difficult concept really. Does a broad construction of the case lead to motive changing the action by changing its nature? Like locking the door of a burning building. Is locking the door legal? Not hard.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.