Varadkar “has relished wearing the green jersey on Brexit and standing up to the British with the help of the European Union — and been aware of the political benefits of doing so. But now the pitfalls begin to emerge from the fog.”https://www.spectator.co.uk/2019/07/varadkars-backstop-gamble-could-cost-ireland-dearly/ …
-
-
Als antwoord op @FraserNelson
@mickfealty, interested to know your thoughts on this.2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @CraigThurlbourn @FraserNelson
Has Leo been narrow minded, short termist, and play Brexit for cheap green votes? Yes. Trouble is he’s now locked in place by the consensus which has formed around him. What Liam and Fraser don’t account for is the EU charters are all integral to Irish constitutional law.
0 antwoorden 1 retweet 4 vind-ik-leuks -
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
Als antwoord op @Sean_Molloy @mickfealty en
Article 349 Lisbon can solve the backstop from the EU end. UK constitution is not treaty based so can be flexible. It is the EU that must work strictly within treaties.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @Sean_Molloy en
I understand that but you’d think someone in the UK administration would have figured other countries are bound to ask for permission their people before making a constitutional change and that such treaties as are enabled in that way cannot be subject to “wee deals” on the side.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
We wrote to Barnier and Coveney. No response. Article 349 covers the impact on external relations that can harm an Eu member territory. There aren't any other EU states I can think of where this applies. Putting theoreticals and hypotheticals before a real issue isnt wise for EU
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.