(1) There's no differentiation between the tests which are done for 'cancer and brain tumours' in the stats. That's typically done under the Suspected Cancer diagnostic framework, usually screened and stratified by a clinician such as a consultant radiologist or endoscopist...https://twitter.com/Miles4Lothian/status/1034704908317016064 …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Als antwoord op @drmarcaitken @aitken_marc
It cannot be used as indicator of sound healthcare planning when it suits the government and not when it doesn't. No issue in scrapping targets personally, but not in favour of cherry picking good news. @MilesBriggsMSP
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @JonMarcStanley @aitken_marc
Because Scotland's news media cherry picks good news about the Scottish Governnent? Is this seriously what you're suggesting?
1 antwoord 0 retweets 9 vind-ik-leuks -
Anyone see the recent "Patient Satisfaction Survey results?" in the media? Guess they were pretty good then.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 5 vind-ik-leuks -
Nice and subjective. The faithful will tell you fairies are real. Unless scored against other systems its meaningless.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Scored against previous studies should reveal trends. My last £ says it would have been all over the media if the trend had been negative.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 2 vind-ik-leuks
Not in Scotland, no.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.