1. OK, John, since you’ve asked this question, let me try to explain this issue.https://twitter.com/johnredwood/status/1007189354446557185 …
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
2. In their application Vote Leave made it clear they weren’t seeking to set out future relationship with the EU, but instead their “sole purpose” was to campaign to leave the European Union and maximise voter participation and turnout.pic.twitter.com/vBUjX9K6ks
13 antwoorden 188 retweets 581 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
3. The application also states that the campaign will represent smaller groups. That the full range of options arguing for a ‘Leave’ outcome deserve to be heard, and they have to be heard for a successful outcome. That all their concerns are ‘legitimate’ and ‘equally valid’.pic.twitter.com/fTXZNkkhDq
5 antwoorden 130 retweets 446 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
4. It goes on to add GO and http://Leave.EU into the groups that “deserve to be heard and have to be heard for a successful outcome”.pic.twitter.com/l2MXV4K6UK
4 antwoorden 112 retweets 363 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen -
5. http://Leave.EU were at some point pushing for a Norway model but without Freedom of Movement. Something they believed was possible.pic.twitter.com/Oict0kcITV
11 antwoorden 182 retweets 524 vind-ik-leuksDeze collectie tonen
Let us know when the EU offers that. It's the Liechtenstein option. We are waiting.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.