┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| psst! hey kid! ┻┳| ┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| _ ┻┳| •.•) If impeachment is only ┳┻|⊂ノ feasible when the outcome ┻┳| is certain and there's no ┳┻| political risk, then ┻┳| impeachment is effectively ┳┻| nonexistent
-
-
Okay, but this is a "will definitely fail" situation.
-
Even if the impeachment fails, there must be some value to humiliating him via public testimony and further exposure of his crimes (minus redaction this time around).
-
But when it inevitably fails, which is the equivalent to an acquittal, Donald Trump and Rush Limbaugh can rightly claim that he was found not guilty of all the crimes we know he’s committ(ed/ing). That’s worse for the resistance. The best course of action: vote Dems in 2020.
-
Ah yes, because he definitely won't (and isn't presently) doing that already. Let's not do X because Trump and Limbaugh will lie about it to their sheep who take them at their word is an argument you can apply to literally anything
-
Except that during the Lewinsky scandal, when the Senate acquitted Bill Clinton, the Republican Party lost seats in the midterm. The opposition party NEVER loses seats in the midterms. An unsuccessful inquisitorial impeachment caused that loss. It’ll cause one for Dems, too.
-
Bad example
-
You have to remember that most people who vote don’t follow politics and operate on very low signal. Trump is acquitted means something very different to those folks than it does to you or me
-
Respectfully disagree. I think the news seeps into those who don't watch it through friends and family. Impeachment will become popular the more it is covered.
- 1ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.