Will same message be placed on publications from journals? Pre-publication peer revise rarely adds value and never ensures validity.
-
-
-
I would argue that the now-infamous coronavirus pre-print that has triggered some conspiracy theories would have been called out in pre-publication peer review.
- Još 15 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@biorxivpreprint has become a damping place of disinformation? I thought at least there a bit of vetting/fair scrutiny before authors damp their trashes. Sad and really bad for the scientific community. Is@biorxivpreprint becoming the@Facebook of academia? -
It's basically a dumping ground, as far as I'm concerned.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Please also moderate the
@disqus comments carefully. Disqus lets cranks downvote scientists and remove their comments at sites not actively moderating. They hurt the discourse. -
All comments are moderated.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you. This is where
#Scicomm and#ScienceTwitter needs to do their job and call out the bad science quickly before#disinformation hits. Journalists, scientists, BioRxiv, all of us who intersect with scientific communication play a role.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
There's a push to get people in the field to look over the papers and add commentary.https://twitter.com/ryneches/status/1223439143503482880 …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I like this. Would not complain at a banner across every pdf page (like some journals do for drafts) also
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.