just remember that Merrick Garland was also eminently qualified as well and wasn't even given the dignity of a vote
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about the "fair process" for Garland? Oh that doesnt count because Obama appointed him.
#hypocrisyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sorry John. That was BS that Republicans blocked Garland. Payback time coming.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So was Merrick Garland.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like the GOP gave to Merrick Garland?
-
they followed the plan Senator Biden outlined in 1992!
-
so we should keep going back until we come up with an agreeable result? Sure.
-
No, we should recognize for almost a century no judge was put in during last year of admin. BO got his other 2 nominees
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@ZekeJMiller@POTUS Did Merrick Garland get a fair senate process? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So was GARLAND.
-
I know the action the republicans took was very likely unconstitutional, but I can't say I'm angry
-
For one it was rather clever, and I've been wanting an originalist to replace an originalist
-
Of course, it's only fair that dems get to filibuster the nominee since we treated them as we have
-
But we hold the entire congress, so it won't change much
-
Wait two years...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Merrick Garland sure wasn't given the same respect. Hypocrites.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And so was Garland. What's your point? And if HRC was POTUS you guys would be filibustering already.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.