1. In most states—tho not all—that dime bag conviction would be a misdemeanor, not a felony, and thus wouldn't trigger disenfranchisement: https://www.brennancenter.org/criminal-disenfranchisement-laws-across-united-states … So that’s not a good counter. The role of drugs in driving mass punishment and mass incarceration is… complicated.https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1121421715324772354 …
-
-
4. We have no idea how many property and drug convictions are cases where the defendant is pleading around a plausible violence conviction, but they are some chunk of that pool. And that’s from 2006. Bet violence matters even more now—ironically, given that violence has fallen.
Show this thread -
5. Here’s data on felony admits to prison (yes, a much different category than “convicted of a felony”). As is clear, the ROLE of violence ROSE over the 1990s and 2000s, even as ACTUAL violence fell: https://twitter.com/JohnFPfaff/status/916302758113955840 …pic.twitter.com/wc1F4Kr8qH
Show this thread -
6. It’s inarguable that violence plays LESS of a role in driving felony CONVICTIONS as opposed to prison admits or pops (where violence = 55% of state prisoners). But minor drugs isn’t driving this either. It’s violence, it’s burglary, it’s gun charges, it’s real theft.
Show this thread -
7. To be clear, my response to the Boston Bomber case is still “yes.” The number of Boston Bombers is so small that I’m okay with that problematic case getting thru rather than trusting the system to draw a line somewhere else. But:
Show this thread -
8. Like with mass incarceration, we don’t want to convince ppl that a “keep the vote for weed cases” is a policy that will have much of an effect. Because it won’t.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.