You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
"Party of science": Gender: unfalsifiable White privilege: unfalsifiable Systems of power: unfalsifiable Patriarchy: unfalsifiable Lived experience/"my truth": inaccessible/unfalsifiable Equality: unachievable Equality + diversity: incompatible Nuclear power: unthinkable
EDITED TO ADD: Evo psych: inconvenient Climate models: unfalsifiable IQ: unethical GMOs: unethical/unsafe Individualism: unethical Objectivity: undesirable Blank slate and/or cognitive creationism: sacrosanctpic.twitter.com/1dV51Uxhhm
It's also worth noting there's an increasingly powerful faction of wokeists that seeks to reduce the scientific method to the story of "oppression" and promote new "ways of knowing". It's crazy how little criticism this extremism receives from politicians or the national press.pic.twitter.com/aamV3MimWw
Ideological adherence is usually anti science
Indeed. Science is a methodology - not a viewpoint. The aim of science is to explain. The aim of advocacy is to advance individual/group interests. Advocates prefer drama to data. That works just fine in junior high drama club, but doesn’t cut it in a world that builds stuff
Take it up with investment bank Lazard whose numbers indicate nuclear isn't really viable compared to renewables:https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-and-levelized-cost-of-storage-2019/ …
They wouldn’t know science if it smacked them over the head with an Ehrlenmayer flask.
Now give us the infallible truths from the "Party of MAGA and God?
I'll worry about them the day they have a cultural hegemony. In the meantime, I'll worry about the existing cultural hegemony.
A lot of these woke academics can't run an experiment and can't read an academic paper
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
