Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JohanRicher

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JohanRicher

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    23. tra 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    If we want to prevent disasters like the Iowa caucus app or the failure to do effective social media campaigning in 2016, we need to change the way we fund, build, and employ the campaign workers, techies included.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    A couple days after Obama was re-elected the political staffers walked in to the tech floor of the Obama campaign HQ and wondered where everyone was. They’d all be laid off, had found them jobs in industry & everybody faded back in to tech companies.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    There needs to be much more money in order to sustain things. The Obama and Clinton campaigns spent tens (maybe hundreds) of millions of dollars on tech but it was building tech which was mostly thrown away.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. prije 6 sati

    Pour comprendre le fiasco des et pourquoi les apps sont souvent propriétaires et/ou codées avec les pieds 👇

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    In normal tech circles we’d have a bunch of free software libraries and tools we build on together, but the campaign tech space doesn’t have this because decision makers fear our tools will be taken and used by the other side.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    Non-candidate groups often use ActionKit if they’re bigger or ActionNetwork if they’re smaller, or even NationBuilder. The latter became persona-non-grata after working to get Trump elected. MoveOn funded the creation of ActionKit, and the AFL-CIO did it for ActionNetwork.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    The fundamental problem is we’ve got a very broken way we fund campaign tech on the democratic side of the isle in the US. There is tons of money in politics but it doesn’t get used in the way which builds anything sustainable. Here are some reasons why.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 18 sati

    D'ailleurs, si vous voulez rire, Guérini a fait exclure Villani du parti, mais Le Gendre refuse de le faire exclure du groupe, parce qu'il faudrait aussi exclure Lang, Renson (VP de l'AN), voire d'autres dissidents aux municipales, et ils ont peur de perdre la majorité absolue

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    Ok... because the lesson here is that we need a *different* app? Cool cool cool cool cool

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 sati

    "Sure, I've written lots of those" [later] "Did you say 'election app' or 'Electron app'"

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Pour Lordon, il y a un conflit de radicalité – cf. Piketty lui avait reproché d’être trop radical et de ce fait de ne pas être une opposition crédible au capitalisme – mais, « les plus radicalisés ne sont pas ceux qu’on croit » car « la radicalité elle vient d’en haut ! »

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Lordon interroge Piketty sur les « conditions politiques » de réalisation d’un tel programme. Là encore, le passage est très intéressant à lire (ici ma retranscription de 1h 01 min 10 s à 1h 03min 45 s).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    Même s’il pourrait être discuté, ce passage est excellent et, pour ceux qui ont le temps, il faut l'écouter ou le lire (ici ma retranscription, entre 7 min 49s et 13 min 05 s).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Yo twitter ! Besoin de toi : on ressort d'un week-end un peu fou autour du projet la réforme des retraites 🥰 >> Pour finir les projets les plus 💥🤯, il nous manque un.e graphiste ou webdesigner 🦄 Tu serais pas motivé.e pour nous donner un coup de main... 😇 ?

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Une petite nouvelle après un mois de service: vous êtes nombreux à venir et revenir sur le site, plus de 25.000 ce mois ci, et 1200 chaque jour. Certains m'ont demandé un mode de recherche plus avancé, le voici :

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 24 sata

    One thing that's important to stress about Iowa is that everybody at the caucus events learns the outcome. The statewide result could be reconstructed even if there weren't a paper trail, but there is also a very thorough paper trail. The integrity of the election is not in doubt

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The process broke down; systematically and individually in many precincts, both people and technology failed

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I'm still not sure what the Iowa couscous is.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    After the second alignment (round), the final count for the Paris satellite Iowa Caucus: 8 6 3 Warren and Sanders each picked up a supporter. The 3 remaining candidates get 1 delegate each.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·