How should we evaluate tools for thought? There's no simple metric, as far as I can tell. The best tools change your paradigm anyway, so your old metrics (books printed per year?) aren't what matter. Here's one (vague, but focusing): how much meaning is unlocked on the margin?
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Odgovor korisniku/ci @andy_matuschak
Provocative question! This q is quite similar to what we grapple with in
#creativity research. Agree there is no simple metric, need to triangulate. NSF-sponsored creativity support tools workshop (led in part by@benbendc) had this as a major conclusion: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/CST/Papers/creativitybook_final.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Qng9pt36Kf
1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
For me, one focusing point is the extent to which the conceptual space expands. So we should look for qualitative rather than quantitative shifts (or if quant, looking for changes in the function, not just slope).
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
One nice example of this sort of qualitative shift measure is this work by @pierre_azoulay: rate at which new standardized keywords are added to a field: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.x …pic.twitter.com/ORH5JYV2Bv
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.