How should we evaluate tools for thought? There's no simple metric, as far as I can tell. The best tools change your paradigm anyway, so your old metrics (books printed per year?) aren't what matter. Here's one (vague, but focusing): how much meaning is unlocked on the margin?
-
-
One nice example of this sort of qualitative shift measure is this work by
@pierre_azoulay: rate at which new standardized keywords are added to a field: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.x …pic.twitter.com/ORH5JYV2Bv
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Margaret Boden's idea of "transformational creativity" is a nice conceptual grounding for this too. Nicely described here (although not the original paper): http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/11_3Grace.pdf … - can be formalized with Bayesian surprise methods if you have good ways of mapping the domainpic.twitter.com/mNUaGISj3q
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.