How should we evaluate tools for thought? There's no simple metric, as far as I can tell. The best tools change your paradigm anyway, so your old metrics (books printed per year?) aren't what matter. Here's one (vague, but focusing): how much meaning is unlocked on the margin?
-
-
For me, one focusing point is the extent to which the conceptual space expands. So we should look for qualitative rather than quantitative shifts (or if quant, looking for changes in the function, not just slope).
-
One nice example of this sort of qualitative shift measure is this work by
@pierre_azoulay: rate at which new standardized keywords are added to a field: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.x …pic.twitter.com/ORH5JYV2Bv
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Folks in visual analytics also grapple with this: they want to create tools that increase p(insight), but that is hard to conceptualize and measure: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1626178 … - they come to a similar conclusionpic.twitter.com/P2L4HE9MuF
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.