Still got nothing on David Foster Wallace
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In love with their erudition. Also a sign that the writer practiced law for a year, maybe two at most: any judge / client would say “if you can’t get to the point on all of your arguments in ten or twenty pages then clearly you have a bad argument / you are wasting my time.”
-
In love with themselves. That mess is not erudite.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is not a footnote. This is an article within an article.pic.twitter.com/yAagm2JbZo
-
There are two more points made on the previous page! Unreal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if everything is below the line then is anything below the line?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good times, those cite checks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m pretty sure my software won’t work on these footnotes.

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Embarrassing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The articles editor assigned to this piece may be entitled to financial compensation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.