Joe Hilgard, the psych prof we all know and love

@JoeHilgard

Asst. prof at . Likes: Studying aggression, meta-research, video games, synthesizers. Dislikes: Publication bias, trim-and-fill

Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2011.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JoeHilgard

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JoeHilgard

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 12 sati

    New editors appointed at ! EiC: Senior Eds: (Cognitive) (Methods & Practice) (Social) (Clinical) Joining continuing Senior Eds: (Personality) (Org) (Developmental)

    Poništi
  3. 27. sij

    One of the most rewarding experiences as a reacher and why it important to present your research to those who are being researched (a thread)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Poništi
  5. 2. velj

    🔥💯 “The problem isn’t that refs are bad. It’s that they’re too good. [...] for years, [NBA stars] got the most favorable treatment [...]. Now the refs are [...] no longer giving preferential treatment—leading to huge complaints from the people who have to play by fairer rules.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Right. This is, as I said, mostly correct. However, the view presented at the end is entirely too bleak. A few points aren't as convincing to me as they might be to others. But let's confine ourselves to this:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. Saturday morning bump

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    I appreciate this behind-the-scenes look at a tough decision. I’d like to see more transparency from and other societies about policies & plans. E,g., What steps were taken towards open access in the 2019 APS contract negotiations with SAGE?

    Poništi
  9. Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. Blog post: Are frauds incompetent? Why I think we're only catching a fraction of data fakers, and why data forensics isn't up to the task.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. Found a conference abstract from same team reporting another d = 3 effect. Impressive.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    When faked data are uncovered, they are very often crude and "obvious" in their construction. Are we not catching smarter fakers because most fakers are not smart, or because the data they fake is too realistic for us to spot them?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. Thanks for coming all the way to Bloomington, Illinois(?!?)

    Poništi
  14. Systematic review of a particular task outcome. One researcher (hollow points) has found some very large effects!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. I've been considering assigning the Slate writeup rather than the actual JPSP article.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. Twice now this article has proven to be too long for the grad students to read alongside Simmons et al.😣 Gonna have to rethink the syllabus next time.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. Talking Bem's "Feeling the Future" in seminar today. I forgot how many of these p-values are <.01...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. Welcome to Editorial Manager for Journal of...

    Poništi
  19. 27. sij

    I love this! Kathleen Hall Jamieson is amazing. I’m so glad she is being honored.

    Poništi
  20. Acronyms I need: SNATBEF Sufficiently Negligent As To Be Equivalent to Fraud

    Poništi
  21. 25. sij

    We’ve introduced Wellness Geese to campus to help students de-stress during the exam period.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·